By Luis López
During this quantity, Luis L?pez sheds new mild on details constitution and makes an important contribution to paintings on grammatical operations within the Minimalist software. via a cautious research of dislocations and concentration fronting in Romance, the writer exhibits that notions akin to 'topic' and 'focus', as frequently outlined, yield no predictions and proposes as an alternative a function process according to the notions 'discourse anaphor' and 'contrast'. He offers a close version of syntax---information-structure interplay and argues that this interplay happens on the section point, with a privileged function for the sting of the section. extra, he investigates phenomena in regards to the syntax of gadgets in Romance and Germanic - accusative A, p-movement, clitic doubling, scrambling, item shift - and exhibits that there are cross-linguistic correlations among syntactic configuration and specificity, autonomous of discourse connectedness. the quantity ends with a longer research of the syntax of dislocations in Romance.
Read Online or Download A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure (Studies in Theoretical Linguistics) PDF
Similar grammar books
This monograph experiences problems with present minimalist difficulty, reminiscent of no matter if variations within the expression of argument and syntactic constitution can all be attributed to the parameterization of particular practical heads. particularly, this e-book experiences in-depth the level to which edition within the expression of causation, to be had either intra- and crosslinguistically, might be accounted for via beautiful purely to the microparameterization of the causative head, reason, as formerly argued for by means of linguists akin to Pylkk?
A cross-linguistic examine of grammatical morphemes expressing spatial relationships that discusses the connection among the way in which people adventure area and how it truly is encoded grammatically in language. The dialogue of the similarities and alterations between languages within the encoding and expression of spatial kinfolk facilities round the emergence and evolution of spatial grams, and the semantic and morphosyntactic features of 2 varieties of spatial grams.
The argument constitution of verbs, outlined because the a part of grammar that bargains with how members in verbal occasions are expressed in clauses, is a classical subject in linguistics that has bought enormous realization within the literature. This publication investigates argument constitution in English from a usage-based standpoint, taking the view that the cognitive illustration of grammar is formed by means of language use, and that the most important elements of grammatical association are tied to the frequency with which phrases and syntactic structures are used.
- The Emergence and Development of SVO Patterning in Latin and French: Diachronic and Psycholinguistic Perspectives
- Grammar and Vocabulary of the Lau Language, Solomon Islands
- Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar
- A grammar of Assiniboine : a Siouan language of the Northern Plains [Montana, Saskatchewan]
- Natural Language Parsing: Psychological, Computational, and Theoretical Perspectives (Studies in Natural Language Processing)
Extra info for A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure (Studies in Theoretical Linguistics)
Structural asymmetry between antecedent and anaphor has been abundantly explored in the realm of sentence level anaphors and it has successfully been captured with the concept of c-command (Reinhart 1983). The relationship between dislocated constituents and their antecedents is also asymmetrical, but this asymmetry is reXected in the kinds of discourses in which they can appear felicitously. Let us assume a classiWcation of discourses in two classes, coordinate and subordinate, as in the Segmented Discourse Representation Theory developed by Nicholas Asher and his associates.
If it is, then a constituent identiWable as [+Focus] will have predictable behavior. It turns out that [+Focus] does not make any predictions. As we have seen, a constituent marked as [+Focus] may stay in situ or it may move—but whatever makes it move is not the focus feature, since focus can contentedly stay in situ. I suggest that movement to left periphery position, either by FF or wh-phrases, is connected with [+c]. 34) Context: Did you buy furniture? Doncs, de cadires no en vaig comprar . .
I suggest that what non-D-linked whphrases and regular focused phrases have in common is simply that they are not anaphoric, that is, they are [Àa]. But there are also substantial similarities between fronted focused constituents and wh-phrases, D-linked or not. The clearest similarity is that they both move to the left periphery. The second one is that both open up quantiWcational sets. Thus, both FF and wh-phrases are [+c] (Vallduvı´ and Vilkuna 1998) and the feature [+c] is connected with the left periphery.