By Aisha Y. Musa (auth.)
Read Online or Download Ḥadīth As Scripture: Discussions on the Authority of Prophetic Traditions in Islam PDF
Best middle eastern books
This compelling research provides an unique examine how 'the state' is represented within the literature of the center East. It comprises chapters on Egypt, Sudan, Lebanon, Iraq, Palestine and Israel, drawing at the services of literary students, historians, political scientists and cultural theorists. The e-book bargains a synthesising contribution to wisdom, putting Arab literature in the context of emergent or conflicting nationalist initiatives within the region.
This choice of essays explores the now normally extinct concept of “Semites. ” Invented within the 19th century and necessary to the making of contemporary conceptions of faith and race, the unusual cohesion of Jew and Arab lower than one time period, “Semite” (the opposing time period used to be “Aryan”), and the conditions that caused its disappearance represent the topic of this quantity.
Bargains new perspectives at the contrasts among Arabic and English and on modern theoretical and utilized linguistics
- In the Shadow of World Literature: Sites of Reading in Colonial Egypt (Translation/Transnation)
- An Introduction to Arabic Literature
- Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám (Oxford World's Classics)
- The Black Book
- Parenthesis in Biblical Hebrew (Studies in Semitic Languages and Linguistics)
Additional info for Ḥadīth As Scripture: Discussions on the Authority of Prophetic Traditions in Islam
The argument implies that if potential errors and uncertainty are not used to challenge the reliability of eyewitness testimony, they should not be used to challenge the reliability of Prophetic reports. What al-Shafi4i has not done is confront and refute the problems of error and uncertainty in the Madith. Al-Shafi4i then compares the standards for accepting an eyewitness with the standards for accepting a transmitter of Madith (mumaddith), saying: If you have been commanded to do that based on the reliability of the two eyewitnesses, according to what is readily apparent, then you accept them according to what is readily apparent, and only God knows the unseen.
It is not just any legal situation, but the most serious possible—a capital crime: “I said: ‘what do you say about this man next to me? ’” “He said: ‘No, but by way of deduction. ’ ”38 Al-Shafi4i then asks about various other possible understandings that the intrinsic meaning of God’s Book may allow. ”39 Here, al-Shafi4i portrays his opponent as someone who applies a double standard of certainty where certainty is concerned, challenging the acceptance of Prophetic reports on the basis of certainty, yet accepting uncertain testimony under the most serious of circumstances.
In Judaism, the Mishna serves much the same function that the Madith have come to serve in Islam. It is a codification of the Oral Law and contains rulings related to the details of ritual purity, prayer, marriage, divorce, and so on. 18 However, 4Umar is credited with objecting to not only the writing of the Madith, but also to transmitting them. Perhaps the strongest and most compelling story about 4Umar’s attitude toward Prophetic traditions is that found in volume six of the Tabaqat. Here, Ibn Sa4d relates the story of 4Umar’s instructions to a delegation of companions that he is sending to the region of Kufa to serve as administrators.